Land Use Patterns in Relation to Lake Water Quality in the Lake George and Oaks Pond Watersheds
Problems in Environmental Science
Biology 493
Colby College
Waterville, ME

Outline of Presentation
SECTION 1
Characteristics of Lake George and Oaks Pond
Watershed Land Use
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Development
INTERMISSION
SECTION 2
Lake George Regional Park
Water Chemistry
Phosphorus Loading Model & Future Projections
Summary & Recommendations
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

General Characteristics of Lake George and Oaks Pond
Kirsten Ness

Objectives of the Study
Determine the current water quality of Lake George and Oaks Pond
Identify possible inputs of nutrients and pollutants
Suggest ways to maintain quality of the lakes and improve problematic areas

Methods
Water Quality Assessment
Data Acquisition
Water Chemistry
Watershed Assessment
Land Use
GIS
Development

Definition of a Watershed
Area of land that contributes runoff to a body of water
Watershed boundaries obtained from MDEP

Lake Stratification
Layers of lakes
Epilimnion
Thermocline
Hypolimnion
Dimictic lakes
Overturn occurs twice each year

Lake George
Area = 304 acres
Maximum depth = 68 ft
Mean depth = 24 ft
Deep basin
Two major inlets
One outlet

Oaks Pond
Area = 87 acres
Maximum depth = 53 ft
Mean depth = 25 ft
Deep basin
Two major inlets
One outlet

Geology
Glacial formation of lakes
North / South orientation
Dominant soil series
Thorndike
Plaisted

Trophic State
Oligotrophic
Low nutrient levels
Low productivity
Young
Eutrophic
High nutrient levels
High productivity
Mature
Mesotrophic
Moderate nutrient levels
Moderate productivity

Cultural Eutrophication
Accelerated eutrophication due to human activity
Increased levels of nutrients
Phosphorus and nitrogen

Macrophytes
Native plant species
Arrowhead
Coontail
Elodea
Northern pipewort
Pickerel weed
Pond lilies
Watershield

Macrophytes
Invasive plant species
Variable leaf milfoil
Eurasian milfoil
Parrot feather

Fisheries
Lake George and Oaks Pond
Warm water fishery
Cold water fishery
Stocking

Land Use Patterns
Creation of land use maps
Land use categories
Results
Trends over time

Land Use Assessment
Land use types have varying effects on lake water quality
Different vegetation cover influences surface runoff and erosion
Essential to evaluate the patterns and trends in order to evaluate ecosystem health

Steps in Creating the Land Use Maps
Obtain aerial photographs
1955 from James W. Sewall Company
1997 from USGS
Scan images and align in GIS
Determine land use categories
Classify areas using GIS

Aerial Photograph (1955)
Land Use Categories
Natural Uses
Wetlands
Mature Forest
Transitional Forest
Regenerating Forest
Reverting Land
Development Uses
Commercial
Agricultural
Cleared
Residential
Roads

Wetlands
Transitional areas between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems
Serve as sources and sinks for phosphorus
Less than 5% of watersheds

Forests
Positive benefit on water quality
Buffers against erosion and allows nutrients time to bind to soil

Regenerating Land
Early successional stage which follows logging
Even stand of vegetation

Reverting Land
Filling in of an old field with pioneer species
Patchy forest cover
Represents a small percentage

Residential and Commercial Lands
Shoreline and non-shoreline
LGRP, businesses, gravel pits, and Eaton Mountain ski slope
Increases in the amount of impervious surfaces increases runoff
All represent small percentages

Agricultural Land
One of leading sources of lake pollution
Currently a small percentage of land uses

Roads
Roads fragment ecosystem
Result in large areas of impervious services
Represent approximately one percent of total areas

Cleared Areas
Includes selection cuts, logging roads, and skidder trails
Clearcutting can increase amount of runoff by 45%

Slide 29
Land Use Patterns in 1955 and 1997
Land Use Summary
Decreased agriculture
Increased forested areas
Increased shoreline residential areas
Careful monitoring of logging and development in future

 Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Michael J. Rogalus III

What is GIS?
Slide 34
Slide 35
Slide 36
Slide 37
Slide 38
Slide 39
Models
Erosion Potential Model
Logging Suitability Model
Development Suitability Model

Erosion Potential Model
Erosion Potential Model
Erosion Potential Model
Erosion Potential Model
Logging Suitability Model
Logging Suitability Model
Logging Suitability Model
Logging Suitability Model
Development Suitability Model
Development Suitability Model
Development Suitability Model
Development Suitability Model
GIS Summary
Development
Deandra Brassard
Shoreland Zoning
Residential Survey
Buffer Strip Survey
Septic Systems
Road Survey

Shoreland Zoning
Shoreland Zoning Ordinance
Encourage responsible development
Protect water quality
Limit erosion
Conserve wildlife and vegetation
Shoreland Zone = land within 250 ft of the normal high water mark of a lake

Shoreland Zoning Regulations
100 ft minimum setback from the shoreline
Additional regulations
Lot size
Septic system placement
Expansion of existing buildings

Non-Conformance
Many homes do not conform to the regulations
Important to reduce the number of
   non-conformities over time

Residential Survey
Negative effects of residential land
Added nutrients
Fertilizers and pesticides
Household waste
Septic systems
Increased run off due to impervious surfaces
Driveways
Roof tops
House counts
Shoreline versus non-shoreline
Seasonal versus year round

Residential Survey Results
Lake George (56 houses)
61% shoreline
39% non-shoreline
55% seasonal
45% year round
Oaks Pond (141 houses)
38% shoreline
62% non-shoreline
33% seasonal
67% year round

Residential Survey
Conversion of homes from seasonal to
    year round
Shoreline development
Lake George
Oaks Pond
Residents should practice good buffer management techniques

Buffer Strips
Minimize surface runoff
Help prevent erosion
Absorb nutrients and pollutants
A buffer should consist of four layers:
   trees, shrubs, groundcover, and a duff layer

Buffer Strip Survey
Percent lakeshore buffer coverage
Buffer depth from shoreline
Slope between house and shore
Buffer composition

Buffer Strip Survey Results
Slide 64
Septic Systems
Store and treat fecal waste
Improper maintenance
Increased nutrient loading
Contamination of lake water
Regulations
Setback, volume, and location
Inefficient systems are present in the watershed

Septic Systems
Many shoreline systems were not designed to handle current use
New and replacement systems must comply with strict regulations
Voluntary upgrades may improve lake water quality

Road Survey
Impervious surfaces
Direct path for runoff
Deposit nutrients and contaminants into lakes
In some watersheds, up to 80% of phosphorus loading is attributed to roads
Non-detailed survey      paved roads
Detailed survey     camp roads

Road Survey
Road survey factors
Surface cover, ditches, culverts, water diversions, erosion potential, and total area
Road classification
Severe risk, high risk, risk, acceptable, and ideal

Road Survey
Effective culvert
Ineffective culvert

Road Survey Results
Road Survey Results
Development Summary
Development increases
Number of impervious surfaces
Area of cleared land
Number of septic systems
Amount of waste being generated
Maintaining healthy lakes
Careful  future planning
Environmentally friendly maintenance techniques

INTERMISSION