INTERMISSION
Slide 2
Background
275 acres
Opened  in 1993
Located in Canaan and Skowhegan
Run by non-profit Lake George Corporation
Funded by entrance fees, grants, and donations

"Facilities"
Facilities
3 Parking Lots
Restrooms
Boat Launch
Beach
Tennis Court
Activities
Swimming
Hiking
Boating
Tennis
Cross-country Skiing
Snowmobiling
Fishing

"Facilities"
Facilities
Parking Lot
Restrooms
Beach
Picnic Area
Basketball and Tennis Courts
Activities
Swimming
Hiking
Tennis
Basketball
Snowmobiling
Fishing

Education
Vernal Pools
Ephemeral wetlands
Do not support a fish population
Characteristic species
Endangered ecosystems

Archaeology
Dig in 1994
Brief occupation of multiple cultural groups
8,000 years ago
Split cobble
Gray rhyolite            cobblestones
Kineo hammer stones

"Park Traffic"
Park Traffic
4,000 visitors in 1993
26,000 visitors in 2001
Potentially more visitors next year

Park Septic Systems
West septic system built in 1994
East septic system built in 1997
Imbalance of use between East and West
East leach field close to shoreline

Access Road
Close proximity to shoreline
Enhances breakdown and erosion of shoreline

Public Boat Launch
Access for runoff and sediment entering Lake George
Nutrient loading-phosphorus
Dirt surface
Width

Gravel Parking Lots
Close proximity to lake
Erosion potential
Source of sedimentation and nutrient loading
Catch basin

Problems Associated with General Recreational Use
Motor Boating
Noise and pollution
Ice Fishing
Water contamination
Illegal ATV use
Snowmobiles

Ecologically Sound Stewardship
East Side Berm
Trail Maintenance
Use Regulations

Park Summary
Resources for recreational and educational opportunities
Sound ecological stewardship
Future management should focus on  minimizing the impact of recreational uses on lake water quality

Water Chemistry
Meghan Kreider

Water Budget
  Flushing Rates:
Lake George = 0.85 flushes/yr
Oaks Pond = 4.91 flushes/yr

Sampling Sites
  Lake George
4 Characterization Sites
7 Spot Sites
2 tributaries
1 outlet
  Oaks Pond
1 Characterization Site
4 Spot Sites
2 tributaries
1 outlet

Water Quality Parameters
  Physical Tests
Color
Conductivity
Dissolved oxygen
pH
Temperature
Transparency
Turbidity
  Biological Tests
Chlorophyll a
Coliform bacteria
  Chemical Tests
Alkalinity
Hardness
Heavy Metals
Nitrates
Total Phosphorus
Volatile Organic Compounds

Lake George Dissolved Oxygen
Important for biological activity
2001 readings from 10 to 0 ppm
Oxygen depletion in hypolimnion
Implications for fisheries

Oaks Pond Dissolved Oxygen
2001 data from 8.0 to 0.2 ppm
Marked levels of oxygen depletion at depth
Implications for fisheries
Potential for internal recycling of phosphorus

Transparency
Measures water clarity as an indicator of trophic state
2001 mean depth values
Lake George = 5.8 m
Oaks Pond = 6.0 m
Both lakes are mesotrophic
4.0 to 7.0 m

Selected Test Results
  Turbidity
Normal < 50 NTU
Mean values
Lake George = 0.63 NTU
Oaks Pond = 0.67 NTU
  Color
Uncolored < 30 SPU
Mean values
Lake George = 23 SPU
Oaks Pond = 21 SPU
  Conductivity
Normal: 20-40 µMHOs/cm
Mean values
Lake George = 25.6 µMHOs/cm
Oaks Pond = 35.1 µMHOs/cm
  Nitrates
Normal ≤1 ppm
Mean values
Lake George = 0.06 ppm
Oaks Pond = 0.06 ppm

Selected Test Results (continued)
  pH
Measure of the relative acidity of water
Mean values
Lake George = 7.14
Oaks Pond = 7.06
Water of both lakes is neutral
  Alkalinity
Measure of the buffering capacity of water
Mean values
Lake George = 8.73 ppm
Oaks Pond = 3.73 ppm
Importance of monitoring in future

Selected Test Results (continued)
Heavy Metals
Potential toxicity to humans and aquatic organisms
Reasons for testing
Spot Site 12 none detected
Spot Site 9 arsenic = 0.02 ppm
Well water creating overflow is not advisable for drinking water

Selected Test Results (continued)
Hardness
Concentration of cations (primarily Ca2+ and Mg2+) in water
Mean
Lake George = 4.17 ppm
Oaks Pond = 3.78 ppm
Soft water lakes

Phosphorus
Limiting nutrient
Critical levels 12 to 15 ppb

Lake George Historical Data (MDEP)
Summer range: 6.0 to 9.5 ppb
Fall range: 5.0 to 9.0 ppb

Lake George Phosphorus
  Fall 2001
Surface = 9.0 ppb
Bottom = 11.3 ppb
  Spot Sites
Site 5
Site 12

Oaks Pond Historical Data (MDEP)
Surface range: 8.0 - 9.0 ppb
Bottom range: 6.0 - 18.0 ppb
Potential internal recycling

Oaks Pond Phosphorus
Spot Sites
Mean = 11.3 ppb
Characterization Site 8
Surface = 8.7 ppb
Bottom = 40.5 ppb

Water Chemistry Summary
Trend of oxygen depletion in hypolimnion
Phosphorus loading may be a greater problem in Oaks Pond
Longer recovery time of Lake George

"Sarah Bostick"
Sarah Bostick

Phosphorus Loading Model
Predicts total phosphorus concentrations
Predicts relative phosphorus loading from each input category
Input categories:
Land use patterns
Atmosphere
Septic systems
Soil retention potential
Predicts impact of future development

Phosphorus Loading Model (continued)
Creating the Model
Area of input categories
Export coefficients
Surface area of the lake
Annual total water inflow
Number capita years

Slide 37
Slide 38
Phosphorus Loading Model (continued)
Calculated phosphorus level:
Lake George:
Phosphorus Model:  8.6 ppb
CEAT data:  8.8 ppb
Oaks Pond:
Phosphorus Model:   9.1 ppb
CEAT data:  8.7 ppb

Slide 40
Future Development
The map is created
from multiple layers:
Water bodies
Roads
Wetlands
Watershed boundaries
Tax maps

Future Development (continued)
Most growth is expected in Canaan
Lake George Regional  Park
Limited Residential District
Shoreline development
Non-shoreline development
Successional habitat changes

Phosphorus Model Projections
Demographic Changes
Conversion of homes from seasonal to year round
Increase in year round shoreline and
   non-shoreline homes
Decrease in mature and transitional forests
More roads
Logging
Increase in cleared and regenerating land
Decrease in mature and transitional forests


Phosphorus Model Projections
Lake George Watershed
Current level = 8.6 ppb
Low demographic change
= 9.0 ppb
Low demographic change with logging
= 10.5 ppb
High demographic change
= 9.5 ppb
High demographic change with logging
= 11.0 ppb


Oaks Pond Watershed
Current Level = 9.1 ppb
Low demographic change
    = 9.3 ppb
Low demographic change with logging
= 9.4 ppb
High demographic change
= 9.5 ppb
High demographic change with logging
= 9.6 ppb

Summary of Phosphorus Modeling and Future Projections
The highest relative phosphorus contributors include roads, shoreline and non-shoreline homes, commercial and municipal land, Lake George Regional Park, agricultural lands, cleared lands, and septic systems
Development and logging will increase phosphorus loading but probably not to the critical limit

Conclusions and Recommendations
Jon Weber

Conclusions
Overall water quality
Land use
Future projections
Town and community concern

Phosphorus Control
Buffer Strips and Erosion Reduction
Improve shoreline buffer strips
Shoreline footpaths
Minimize impervious surfaces and lawns
Roads
Road associations
Hire DEP certified contractors
Shoreline and higher risk roads near water should take priority in repair

Phosphorus Control (continued)
Boat Launches
Lake George
Reduce width
Install water diversions
Different surface
Oaks Pond
Install community launch

"Septic Systems"
Septic Systems
Conduct survey to assess the overall quality of septic systems
Upgrade old systems
Coordinate with DEP for potential grant money
Regular maintenance
Land Use
Logging
Shoreline development
Erosion areas

Lake George Regional Park
Continued education uses
Community and school programs
Vernal pools
Natural history trail guide
Archaeological site
Trail maintenance and signage
Minimize impact of winter activities
Lake George Access Rd. East
Minimize erosion by buffering roadside
Reduce visitor parking along access road
Runoff from gravel parking lots

Invasive Species
Educate boat owners
Post signs near all boat launches
Remove and properly dispose of all plant material

Fish Populations
Stock brown trout
Monitor harvesting
More stringent regulations
Monitor mid-summer oxygen depletion

Community Awareness
Lake associations
Distribution of best management practices to all shoreline residents
Volunteer monitoring

Acknowledgements
Forrest Bonney
Roy Bouchard
Russell Cole
Jeff Dennis
Steve Dionne
Frank Fekete
David Firmage
Bev Fitzsimmons
Randy Gray
Karen Hahnel
Bob Hubbard
Jeff Macabe
Tom Marcotte
Pam Parker
Judy Potvin
William Reid
James Stahlnecker
Dan Tierney
Nancy Warren

Slide 57