| Slide 1 |
| Presentation Overview |
| Introduction | |
| Water Quality Analysis | |
| Land Use Analysis | |
| - Intermission - | |
| GIS Analysis and Models | |
| Future Predictions | |
| Remediation Measures | |
| Recommendations |
| Slide 3 |
| Study Objectives |
| Measure Water Quality of Webber Pond: | |||
| Physical parameters | |||
| DO, Temperature, Turbidity, | |||
| Conductivity | |||
| Chemical parameters | |||
| Total phosphorus, Nitrates, | |||
| Hardness, pH, Alkalinity | |||
| Compare to historical data | |||
| DEP water sampling since 1972 | |||
| Study Objectives |
| Calculate proportion of Webber Pond watershed covered | |||||
| by various land uses: | |||||
| -Road surveys | |||||
| -Residence counts | |||||
| -Buffer strip surveys | |||||
| -GIS land use map analysis | |||||
| -1997 aerial map | |||||
| -1956 aerial map | |||||
| Study Objectives |
| Project the future condition of the Webber Pond watershed: | |||||
| - Create Models | |||||
| - Calculate Phosphorus Loading Model - Calculate population trends | |||||
| - Project future development | |||||
| - Recommend best remediation | |||||
| techniques | |||||
| Characteristics of Maine Lakes |
| Important resources in Maine: Recreational, Economic values | |
| Due to glaciations, many Maine lakes are oriented in a northeast to southwest direction |
| Slide 8 |
| Lake Turnover |
| Webber Pond is dimictic | ||
| Summer thermocline | ||
| Fall turnover | ||
| Winter stratification | ||
| Spring turnover | ||
| Turnover re-oxygenates the lake, recycles nutrients | ||
| Trophic Status of Lakes |
| Nutrients |
| Webber Pond is eutrophic, which means that it is high in nutrients. | |
| High nutrient levels (especially nitrogen and phosphorus) lead to large phytoplankton communities. | |
| Increased productivity leads to increased sedimentation and aging of the lake. | |
| Defining a Watershed |
| Total area contributing flow to a particular basin. | |
| Defined as the highest points of land that surround it. | |
| Historical Perspective of the Webber Pond Watershed |
| 1950Õs - 1960Õs large chicken farms. | |
| Now small vegetable farms, orchard, golf course, lakeshore residences. | |
| 1972 Maine DEP began secchi disk sampling. | |
| Current algal blooms are not as severe as those in 1960Õs - 1970Õs. |
| "Reconstructed in 1986," |
| Reconstructed in 1986, itÕs used to regulate water levels. | ||
| Benefits of stabilizing water levels: | ||
| Minimize shoreline erosion | ||
| Provide stable environment for flora/fauna | ||
| Allows for flushing of high-nutrient water | ||
| 33 percent of the lake volume can be drawndown with dam | ||
| Geographical Perspective of the Webber Pond Watershed |
| Part of the Lower Kennebec River watershed | |||
| A heavily populated area | |||
| Webber Pond covers 1,238 acres | |||
| The Webber Pond watershed covers | |||
| 5,292 acres | |||
| Webber Pond receives water from | |||
| Threemile Pond, Threecornered Pond, Mud Pond | |||
| Biological Perspective of the Webber Pond Watershed |
| Submerged aquatic plants around periphery | |
| Nine species of native fish: | |
| American Eel, Fallfish, White Sucker, Brown Bullhead, Chain Pickerel, Banded Killfish, Red Breasted Sunfish, Pumpkinseed, Yellow Perch | |
| Largemouth Bass, Smallmouth Bass, White Perch were introduced but not actively stocked |
| Fish Stocking of Webber Pond |
| Brown Trout and Brook Trout have to be replaced due Webber Pond water quality. | |||
| Alewives are anadromous, movement blocked by dams | |||
| In the short-term, Alewives may deteriorate water quality | |||
| In long-term, Alewives may help water quality | |||
| Introduced Plants |
| 11 species pose a threat to Maine lakes | ||
| Problematic because: | ||
| spread by fragments | ||
| grow rapidly | ||
| outcompete natives | ||
| hard to eradicate, control | ||
| Webber Pond is at a high risk because: | ||
| soft, shallow bottom | ||
| public access via boat ramp | ||
| Water Chemistry |
| Slide 20 |
| Slide 21 |
| Slide 22 |
| Slide 23 |
| Slide 24 |
| Slide 25 |
| Slide 26 |
| Slide 27 |
| Slide 28 |
| Slide 29 |
| Slide 30 |
| Slide 31 |
| Slide 32 |
| Slide 33 |
| Slide 34 |
| Slide 35 |
| Slide 36 |
| Slide 37 |
| Slide 38 |
| Slide 39 |
| Slide 40 |
| Slide 41 |
| Slide 42 |
| Slide 43 |
| Slide 44 |
| Slide 45 |
| Slide 46 |
| Slide 47 |
| Slide 48 |
| Slide 49 |
| Slide 50 |
| Slide 51 |
| Slide 52 |
| Slide 53 |
| Slide 54 |
| Slide 55 |
| Slide 56 |
| Slide 57 |
| Slide 58 |
| Slide 59 |
| Slide 60 |
| Land Use Analysis Madeleine Mineau |
| Shoreland Zoning |
| Minimum residential lot size: 40,000 sq.ft | |
| Minimum residential shore frontage: 200 ft | |
| Maximum height of | |
| structures: 35 ft | |
| All structures are required to | |
| be set back a minimum of | |
| 100 horizontal feet from the | |
| normal high water mark. | |
| Shoreland Zoning (continued) |
| Campground: Camping areas shall contain a minimum of 5000 sq. ft of land for each site. | |
| Clearing of vegetation is prohibited within 75 feet horizontal distance of the shoreline. | |
| There shall be no cleared opening greater than 250 feet in the forest canopy. |
| Discussion |
| Many non-compliant homes observed. Probably pre-date shoreland zoning ordinance. | |
| The Vassalboro Code Enforcement Officer expressed a concern about the lack of restrictions regarding converting seasonal residences into permanent residences. |
| Buffer Strips |
| Absorb runoff to control nutrients entering the lake. | |
| A good buffer consists of several vegetation layers and a variety of plants and trees to maximize benefits. | |
| Natural vegetation form the best buffers. | |
| Riprap can also be used to protect shoreline erosion. | |
| Buffer Strip Scoring |
| Score determined according to lakeshore coverage, buffer depth and composition, slope, lot distance and need for riprap. Score range 1 Ð 20. | |
| 1 - 9 Poor | |
| 10 Ð 15 Partial | |
| 16 Ð 20 Adequate |
| Slide 67 |
| Slide 68 |
| House Count |
| Assess intensity of residential development in shoreline area and in the watershed as a whole. | |
| Identify and locate other land uses such as: farms, schools commercial buildings. | |
| Assess impact on nutrient | |
| loading of the lake. |
| Slide 70 |
| Subsurface Disposal Systems |
| Must conform with State of Maine | |
| Wastewater Disposal Rules | |
| Minimum setback of 100 horizontal | |
| feet from the normal high water mark. | |
| Town of Vassalboro Ordinances (continued) |
| By December 31, 1995 all wastewater disposal systems in the Shoreland Zone must have: | |
| Provided documentation showing the existing system was installed after July 1, 1974 | |
| Or | |
| Installed a new system in compliance with State of Maine regulations |
| Webber Pond Watershed Subsurface Disposal Systems |
| Almost all systems are septic systems, no holding tanks, one outhouse and one chem-toilet. | |
| State funding is used to help residents with cost of upgrading their system. | |
| Green Valley Campground uses several leach fields up hill from camp sites. | |
| Slide 74 |
| Slide 75 |
| Intermission |