The Fine Arts and Science
Breakthroughs in art and science rarely happen in isolation. Important
changes in society, including science, occur during turbulent times. The two
examples that are discussed here are the changes around 1876,
the time of the development of Gibbs' Free Energy, and 1911,
the date of the first performance of Stravinsky's Rite of Spring.
Impressionism and Gibbs' Free Energy
The time period around 1850 was characterized by a sense of rigidity
and relative stagnation in many aspects of society. A building sense of
unrest and a revolt against conformity lead to sudden changes in art and
science as 1875 approached. Impressionism in the fine arts is a result
of the desire for change. Before 1875, nature was often depicted in art,
but nature was depicted from a distance as an object or idea separate from
human ideas and ideals. The power of nature was depicted, but in a very
Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot's 1855 painting, La
Charette-Souvenir de Marcoussis, is an example of nature as depicted before
Camille Pissaro in 1870
showed some of the beginnings of a sudden shift in how painting was
done. Less attention was paid to detail and in so doing the observer was
consider more the interrelationships of the elements of the painting. Works
like "Moisson a Montoucault" show that artists were beginning to ask what
the purpose of the depiction of objects was.
Pierre-Auguste Renoir's 1876 work, The Swing, shows the emergence of
Impressionism. Representation of a scene takes a minor role to the
depiction of motion and mood. The depiction of dynamic events and emotion
is a hallmark of impressionist works. This same year marks the publication
of Willard Gibbs' hallmark work on Free Energy. Chemists were focussing on
the reasons why changes occur and not just the outward manifestations
of those changes. Physics and chemistry were focussing on the dynamics
of change, hence the field of thermodynamics.
Paul Cezanne's 1880
painting, House in Provence, has more dynamic elements and also seeks
to depict chaos in nature. Both science and art were looking into the
underlying form of nature and not just the surface of phenomena. The
concept of disorder, entropy, was found in the arts and sciences.
This van Gogh painting shows a similar scene to the Corot painting shown
above. The differences are striking.
The intense colors and the lack of detail certainly evoke an strong
emotional response that takes an inward look at the meaning of nature
and art. The painting seeks to more directly involve the observer. These
changes in art parallel the changes in science as science began to look
more closely at the inner workings of nature.
Abstract Art and Quantum Mechanics
The period surrounding 1876 led to a turbulent time that brought many
changes in many aspects of society. An even better example of the parallel
changes in art and science is found in the time period between 1900 and
1926. The unraveling of the structure of the atom and the discovery
of the wave-particle duality of light and matter had a tremendous impact
on the course of science and human history. The emergence of quantum
mechanics in 1926 was the result of a turbulent time in human history.
However, the changes in science were not being played out in isolation.
Art and music were going through and equally turbulent and at times almost
violent revolution. The hallmark in this time period is the first
performance of the ballet "Rite of Spring." The music, written by Igor
Stravinsky was greeted with violent emotions. The same can be said for the
changes in art.
Pablo Picasso's 1903 portrait, "The Blind Man's
Meal," shows only small differences with the legacy of Impressionism and is
shown here to highlight the changes caused by the developments in modern art.
1909 paintings, "Still Life With Bread and Fruit" and "Portrait of
Fernandel," show the search for the underlying form of art, in the same
way as quantum physics was searching for the underlying form of nature.
These Cubist works were a sudden break with the past, just as
wave-particle duality was a break with the past. It is certain that the
physicists and chemists of the day knew of the changes in the fine
arts and visa-versa. One might suggest that the turbulent times in both
fields and in the society as a whole fed off of each other and hastened
the progress that was being made.
Georges Braque (1929, Still-Life: Le Jour),
Picasso, and many other artists were questioning the inner purpose and
meaning of art. Science was questioning the inner meaning of nature.
Picasso's 1939 work, "Night
Fishing at Antibes," shows the progression of the ideas uncovered earlier
at the turn of the century.
Fernand Leger's 1919 sketch for "The Railway Crossing," shows a
complete shift in the way in which artists used the depiction of objects.
These shifts draw us more personally into the artists world. These
works, scientific and artistic, are personally challenging. Because these
ideas involve us more personally and more abstractly, they help us
to focus on the impact of interrelationships.
These interrelationships include the observer and the painting, the student
and the chemical theory, and the driving forces of nature and human activity.