|
The working papers for the Model Comparison Seminar are stored in .pdf files which can be viewed on your screen and printed using Adobe's Acrobat Reader. |
Special Issue of the Journal of Economic and Social Measurement (forthcoming). Macroeconomic Models and Changes in Measurement Concepts: An Overview by Charles G. Renfro, Alphametrics Corp., July 1998.
Abstract: This paper introduces the latest report of the Seminar on Model Comparisons, being a set of articles that describe subsequent effects on representative US macroeconometric models of the most recent benchmark revisions in the US National Income and Product Accounts.
Accompanying Papers:
Chain-Type Data and Macro Model Properties: the DRI/McGraw-Hill
Experience, by Mark J. Lasky, DRI/McGraw-Hill, July 1998.
The WEFA U.S. Macro Model With Chain-Weighted
GDP, by Daniel Bachman, Peter Jaquette, Kurt Karl, and Pasquale Rocco, WEFA,
Inc., February, 1998.
Price Determination in the Indiana Econometric Model
of the U.S., by Willard E. Witte and R. Jeffery Green, Indiana University,
February 1998. Figures which accompany this paper.
Testing the NAIRU Model for the United States by Ray
C. Fair, Yale University, March 1997. (82K)
Abstract: The results in this paper reject, using U.S. data,
the dynamics implied by the standard (NAIRU) view of the long-run
relationship between unemployment and inflation. An alternative way
of thinking about this relationship is suggested. Presented at the
Seminar meeting in New York City on April 25, 1997.
Testing the Standard View of the Long-Run Unemployment-Inflation
Relationship by Ray C. Fair, Yale University, April 1996. (134K)
Abstract: The results in this paper, based on estimating and
testing price equations for 30 countries, do not support the standard
view of the long-run relationship between unemployment and inflation.
They overwhelmingly reject the dynamic implied by the standard
view.
Zero Inflation in Five Years: Simulations with MQEM
by E. Philip Howrey, University of Michigan, June 1990. (44K)
Abstract: Responding to recent suggestions favoring a monetary
policy rule of zero inflation, this paper uses the Michigan Quarterly
Econometric Model to simulate the impact of restrictive monetary
policy on output, employment, and the rate of price inflation.
Presented at the Seminar Meeting in Boston, MA on June 5, 1990.
What Economic Forecasters Really Do by Daniel Bachman,
The WEFA Group, Eddystone, PA. (210K)
Abstract: Academic critics of economic forecasters generally
base their criticisms on the methodological shortcomings of the
techniques used by business economists. In truth, these apparent
problems represent profound wisdom about the nature of economic
knowledge that is recognized by business economists and the users of
their services.
ASPEN: A Microsimulation Model of the Economy by N.
Basu, R.J. Pryor, and T. Quint, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
(240K)
Abstract: This report presents ASPEN, a new agent-based
microeconomic simulation model of the US economy being developed at
Sandia National Laboratories. The model is notable because it allows
a large number of individual economic agents to be modeled at a high
level of detail and with great degree of freedom.