POSSIBLE
MIGRATION ROUTES THROUGH MAINE BY VERNAL MIGRANTS
Andy
McEvoy 09 and Gordon Padelford
11
ES212: Introduction to GIS and Remote Sensing,
Environmental Studies Program, Colby College
Abstract
In
this study we evaluate the possibility of two routes of migration into the
state of
Introduction
Each
spring vast numbers of birds leave their southern wintering grounds and head
north towards breeding grounds. The northern hemisphere provides more land mass
and space, and so also a vast abundance of food and space for territories.
There are many hypotheses regarding the evolution of migration, but almost
certainly part of the explanation lies in the huge amount of resources that
become seasonally available in the summers of the northern hemisphere. Many of
the birds making their way north each spring are destined to settle in the
boreal forests of
Across
In
this study we evaluate two possible migration routes into the state of

Methods
Data
Collection
Data
was collected in a citizen-science project regarding the arrival dates of
spring migrants in
Mapping
Using
ArcGIS 9.3 software we mapped the earliest arrival
date for each species, in each of the reported biophysical regions (Maine
Office of GIS), for each of the ten years. The earliest arrival dates for each
species were averaged over the ten year span, 1995-2005, by biophysical region.
The maps displayed in Figures 2, 3, and 4 display
these averages. Dark colors indicate early arrivals, and light colors indicate
later arrivals. The regions with no data were not included.
Statistical
Analyses
In
order to test our hypotheses we formed two different groups: (1) regions 12-15
comprise the coastal regions, and (2) regions 7-11 comprise the inland regions
(see Figure 1). We did this so that we could compare the coastal arrival dates
to the inland arrival dates. Earlier coastal arrivals would indicate that birds
tend to move up the coast before moving inland and across
Results



Table 1. Results of t-Test for the means of coastal and inland region
arrival dates. *Significant difference at p<.05 value
|
Species |
Costal (Mean, SE) |
Inland (Mean, SE) |
t value |
|
Red
Wing Black Bird |
69.75,
1.916 |
81.33, 2.518 |
(91)
= -3.597* |
|
Common
Grackle |
69.68,
1646 |
61.02, 4.900 |
(97)
= 1.526 |
|
Woodcock |
78.58,
1.307 |
87, 1.970 |
(62)
= -3.706* |
|
Northern
Flicker |
87.39,
3.165 |
100.87, 2.343 |
(87)
= -3.434* |
|
Chipping
Sparrows |
98.75,
2.977 |
107.16, 2.020 |
(87)
= -2.346* |
|
Eastern
Phoebe |
93.27,
1.380 |
74.58, 6.149 |
(53.901)
= 2.966* |
|
Bobolink |
131.65,
1.911 |
132.20, 2.621 |
(81)
= -.171 |
|
Common
Yellowthroat |
129.26,
0.919 |
134.33, 1.622 |
(86)
= -2.690* |
|
Black
Throated Green |
123.86,
.666 |
127.8, .966 |
(87)
= -3.340* |
Discussion
In
general, the results provide support for our hypothesis. Six out of the seven
t-Tests show that the birds move up the coast of
Interestingly,
there was no pattern with regard to the migration routes of birds arriving at
different times. It may have been expected that early arrivals, those appearing
in March, would rely on the moderate coastal climates, and late arrivers, those
arriving in May, would not be as dependent on the moderating climatic effects
of the coast. However, such a pattern is not demonstrated in the maps, or in
the results of the t-Tests. The maps in Figures 2, 3, and 4 provide a visual
sense which supports our hypothesis. Although not quantitative, the maps
support the data. The regions along the coast tend to be darker indicating
earlier arrivals compared to the interior regions.
However,
the data is influenced by its collection methods. Because this is
citizen-science in which the data is collected by volunteers there is bound to
be error introduced. For instance Regions 1-6 reported no observations at all,
and Region 9 was reported in only 60% of the possible observations. If the data in Region 9 is insufficient than the analysis is
compromised. To that extent, this analysis will be bolstered by more
years of collection, but also more collections in each biophysical region. In
contrast, Region 10 has the highest rate of reporting, and it frequently is
among the earlier arrivals. It is reasonable to infer that more data collectors
will yield earlier, and more accurate arrival dates. More data will also allow
for more sophisticated quantitative and spatial analyses, which will yield more
precise results about the migration routes of birds through
Conclusion
In
six out of nine cases the statistical analysis indicated that birds were seen
significantly earlier on the coast compared to inland regions. The eastern
phoebe was the only bird illustrating a significant pattern of arriving inland
before being seen on the coast. Two others showed no statistical difference
between the two regions. While this points to a trend, the results arent
definitive due to a relatively small sample sizes, imperfect citizen science,
and insufficient data in many of the regions. Our analysis lends support to the
hypothesis that vernal migrants tend to migrate up
Acknowledgements
We
would like to thank Dr. Wilson for providing the data which was used in this
study. We would also like to thank the contributors to his citizen-science
program. Lastly, thanks to Manny Gigmond for
providing statistical guidance to further our Geodessey.
References
Berthold,
P. 2001. Bird migration: A general survey. Hans-Gunther
Bauer and Valerie Westhead, translators; second ed.
Kerlinger
P. 1995.
How birds migrate.
Maine Office of GIS. 10 April
2009.
McMahon,
J. S. 1990. The biophysical regions of
National Climatic Data Center. 2005 June
13, 2005. Climate atlas of the
Wilson,
W. H. 2007. Spring Arrival Dates of Migratory Breeding Birds in