Biology 211 Fall 2004
Flowering Plant Taxonomy
Lecture/Discussion:
MWF
Laboratory:
W
Course Web
Pages: www.colby.edu/its/BI211
Instructors: Ray Phillips,
Asst. Prof. of Biology Lovejoy 105, Phone: 4209
(call Chris, my Administrative Secretary, at 4201 to make an appointment),
Email: rbphilli
Lindsey
Colby, Biology Teaching Associate Olin
304, Phone: 3558, Email: lwcolby
This course provides an introduction to the principles and practice of biological systematics and classification (taxonomy). Emphasis is placed on acquiring the facility to use appropriate terminology in order to identify flowering plants, as well as understanding the historical context and investigative procedures used by taxonomists in developing classifications. Of particular importance is gaining an understanding of the philosophical bases in taxonomy and the relevance of this field to the areas of biology that use classifications.
Objectives:
1. Learn
vegetative and reproductive features and terminology that are useful in the
identification of flowering plants.
2. Gain
ability to use published keys for the identification of flowering plants.
3. Learn to
recognize some of the common and unusual families of flowering plants in
4. Understand
the principles of plant taxonomy, including evolutionary trends, patterns of
speciation, biogeography, and floral biology.
5. Gain an
understanding of the relationships between evolutionary mechanisms,
evolutionary history, and the classification of organisms.
6. Develop an
ability to critically examine the extent to which a classification system
reflects relationships between organisms and to understand the reasons for the
significant changes now being made in biological classification systems.
Evaluation:
1. Daily
Quizzes - (5 pts each, drop 3 lowest scores and add 15 pts) 150 pts.
2. Report
Taxonomic review of a group of plants selected by each
student. Due November 29. 150 pts.
3. Examination
I (October 11-15) 100 pts.
4. Examination
II (November 10-15) 100 pts.
5. Laboratory
Exercises 100 pts.
6. Plant
Collection (Oct. 6, Nov. 10, Dec. 8) 200 pts.
7. Lab Exam I:
Family Recognition (Families 1-2, 17-36; Sept. 29) 100
pts.
8. Lab Exam
II: Family Recognition (Families 37-60, 3-16; Nov. 3) 100
pts.
9. Final
Examination (Date to be announced) 100 pts.
TOTAL 1,100
pts.
Textbooks:
Judd, Campbell, Kellogg, and Stevens, 2002. Plant
Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach, 2nd Edition, Sinauer
Associates.
Magee, Dennis W., and Harry E. Ahles, 1999. "Flora of the Northeast. A Manual of
the Vascular Flora of
Plant Collection:
15 additional specimens due Nov.
10,
Complete collection due Dec.
8
The
plant collection must include 100 75 50 40 fully
identified specimens representing different species (or infraspecific
taxa). Ten specimens must be mounted
properly on herbarium paper. A typed or
neatly printed label must be prepared for every specimen and affixed in the
extreme lower, right-hand corner of the sheet for mounted specimens. The label must include the collector's name
and collection number, family, genus and species with the author citation, date
of collection, locality, country, and any other pertinent data. The remaining
unmounted specimens should be loose in folded (11x16) newsprint with a prepared
label as described above. Required: 3 specimens in Poaceae, 2 in Cyperaceae, and 1 in
Juncaceae.
A
field book must accompany the collection.
The field book must be compiled in the field as you collect each
specimen; it should be in pencil; all records must be entered, dated, and
numbered sequentially; and the field book and label data must coincide. You will probably collect more than 50
specimens. Frost comes early in
The
collection will be graded in the following manner:
Identification: Each specimen is worth 5 points. Misidentification to family results in a 7
point assessment; to genus 3 points; and to species 1 point. In difficult groups, species ID is leniently
graded.
Quality
of the collection: Are the leaves and
flowers pressed flat? Is the specimen
dry? Are the upper and lower surfaces
visible? Are the mounted specimens firmly
and totally attached? Is the label
prepared properly? Is the mounting
aesthetically pleasing? A poor quality
specimen will result in a 2 point assessment.
Label
and Field Data: Is the collection label complete and
specific? Given the information on the
label, would it be possible for another collector to return to the same
location? If the specimen is from a tree
or shrub, are there notes on features of the plant (such as tree height, bark
texture) that are not evident from the specimen itself? An inadequate label and field notes for a
specimen will be assessed 2 points.
You
will be able to use the lab after class hours by checking the key out from the
Science Library in Olin (hours are posted and available on the web). Other classes may use the laboratory; a
schedule for the lab will be posted. In
general, the lab is available for your use evenings and weekends. Cabinet space will be available for you to
store your collection as you work on it during the semester.
Report: Taxonomic review of a group
of flowering plants (Preliminary
Report due Oct. 8, Report due Nov. 29, Oral Reports to Class Nov 29 to Dec. 3).
Each
student will select a group of flowering plants and review its taxonomic
history in terms of classification within the group and position relative to
other groups. The focus should be on changes
that have occurred since Linnaeus through the different historical periods when
different approaches to biological classification were used in recognizing groups
(taxa) and their relationships within the group and between this group and
other groups. Special attention should
be given to the changes associated with application of the phylogenetic
approach to classification during the past ten to twenty years. Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic
groups recognized in past classification systems should be identified. Included should be a review of major
characters and the various synapomorphies and symplesiomorphies that have given
rise to different classifications in the past.
The
group selected can be as high (class, subclass, order, family)
or as low (genus, species, varieties) in hierarchical rank as you wish but it
is likely to be more difficult if the group is at a lower rank.
The
group should be selected and reported to the instructor with a basic
bibliography by Oct. 8. Feel free to
talk with the instructor prior to that date as you develop ideas or if you have
questions or need suggestions.
The
report should not be longer then about fifteen pages. If desired, the report can be presented in a
poster form or as a PowerPoint document.
Each student will give a short (5 to 10 minute) oral report to the class
outlining the findings in this review.
These oral reports will take place the week of Nov. 29. The project is worth 150 points, of which 50
points will be based on the oral report and 100 points on the printed report.
Flowering Plant Family Recognition
(Laboratory Exams Sept. 29 and Nov. 3):
During this course you will
be introduced to many flowering plant families.
Some of the most important of these will be reviewed with examples and
the characteristic features will be described and illustrated. You will be expected to recognize members of
these families without the aid of a key.
Most of these you will find very easy to recognize. Below is a complete list of these 60
families. Be sure to see the textbook
and its included CD-ROM, as well as the web pages for this course, where family
descriptions and examples will be found.
|
1. |
Nymphaeaceae |
21. |
Cactaceae |
41. |
Malvaceae |
|
2. |
Magnoliaceae |
22. |
Droseraceae |
42. |
Tiliaceae* (in Malvaceae) |
|
3. |
Araceae |
23. |
Polygonaceae |
43. |
Anacardiaceae |
|
4. |
Lemnaceae* (in Araceae) |
24. |
Viscaceae |
44. |
Aceraceae* (in Sapindaceae) |
|
5. |
Alismataceae |
25. |
Saxifragaceae |
45. |
Ericaceae |
|
6. |
Liliaceae* |
26. |
Crassulaceae |
46. |
Sarraceniaceae |
|
7. |
Iridaceae |
27. |
Vitaceae |
47. |
Solanaceae |
|
8. |
Orchidaceae |
28. |
Geraniaceae |
48. |
Convolvulaceae |
|
9. |
Arecaceae (Palmae) |
29. |
Oxalidaceae |
49. |
Cuscutaceae*(In Convolvulaceae) |
|
10. |
Commelinaceae |
30. |
Euphorbiaceae |
50. |
Rubiaceae |
|
11. |
Bromeliaceae |
31. |
Violaceae |
51. |
Gentianaceae |
|
12. |
Typhaceae |
32. |
Salicaceae |
52. |
Asclepiadaceae* (in Apocynaceae) |
|
13. |
Sparganiaceae* (in Typhaceae) |
33. |
Fabaceae (Leguminosae) |
53. |
Oleaceae |
|
14. |
Juncaceae |
34. |
Rosaceae |
54. |
Plantaginaceae* |
|
15. |
Cyperaceae |
35. |
Ulmaceae |
55. |
Scrophulariaceae* |
|
16. |
Poaceae (Gramineae) |
36. |
Cucurbitaceae |
56. |
Lamiaceae (Labiatae) |
|
17. |
Ranunculaceae |
37. |
Fagaceae |
57. |
Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) |
|
18. |
Papaveraceae |
38. |
Betulaceae |
58. |
Caprifoliaceae |
|
19. |
Caryophyllaceae |
39. |
Onagraceae |
59. |
Campanulaceae |
|
20. |
Chenopodiaceae*(in Amaranthaceae) |
40. |
Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) |
60. |
Asteraceae (Compositae) |
* The
textbook, Judd et al., either does not recognize the family (4, 13, 20, 42, 44,
49 and 52) or has a significantly different circumscription (boundaries around
what is included; 6, 54 and 55) than traditional classifications. For these families use the lab handouts and
web resources for descriptions and examples.
Some families have alternative acceptable names (33, 40, 56, 57, and 60).