- Why Colby?
- Request Information
- College Profile
- Scholars Programs
- Student Perspectives
- Alumni Success
- For Counselors
- Contact Admissions
Colby and its community – current and prospective students, families, faculty, staff and alumni – face many of the same challenges during this period of economic turmoil and financial uncertainty. We will use this page to answer many of the questions being asked about the College’s financial situation and its impact on the Colby community. We welcome your questions and comments: click here.
Information updated on December 18, 2009
Colby College Endowment Report for Fiscal Year 2008-09
IntroductionThe fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, was the most difficult period for capital markets in the last 30 years. The credit crisis led to a high degree of correlation among asset classes, and Colby’s equity-oriented asset allocation suffered in this environment. The Investment Committee of the Board of Trustees was actively engaged in managing both the short-term liquidity challenges of the past year and the longer-term implications for asset allocation that the recent market dislocations have created. We expect this process to be an ongoing challenge for several years.
Endowment GrowthDuring fiscal 2009 the endowment market value contracted by $147 million to $453 million, a 24.5-percent decrease. Figure 1 shows the endowment growth over the past 10 years. The endowment is approximately 1.6 times what it was at the beginning of fiscal 2000, growing at a compound rate of increase of 4.6 percent during the past 10 years, which exceeds the 2.6-percent inflation rate of that period.
Figure 2 summarizes the sources of change in market value for the endowment for fiscal 2009 and for the last 10 years. For fiscal 2009, investment losses and the spending allocation account for the decrease in market value. Over the past 10 years, performance has been offset by spending, with gifts and other additions accounting for the increase in value. This highlights the importance of new additions to the endowment, especially in the form of gifts.
Asset AllocationFigure 3 shows a comparison of the asset allocation of the portfolio at the beginning and end of fiscal 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, the portfolio holds an unusually high cash balance and is underweight in marketable equity asset classes. The dramatic fall in market value in the fall of 2008 coupled with a lack of liquidity in the College’s primary working-capital investment forced the College to focus on raising cash to meet spending and partnership commitments. Over the past year the College conducted a detailed review of all external manager relationships and raised needed liquidity through reductions and terminations of relationships. In the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, a group of private equity partnerships were sold to reduce the amount of outstanding partnership commitments to a level more consistent with the lower current market value of the portfolio. While this process cost the portfolio 2 percent in performance for the year, it was necessary to reduce the level of monthly cash draws to support partnership obligations, to control future allocations to nonmarketable asset classes, and to establish a more sustainable level of relationships in these asset classes. The College has addressed its immediate liquidity needs, but asset allocation modeling suggests that controlling the level of allocation to nonmarketable asset classes, while preserving a core set of relationships, is likely to continue to be a challenge for the next four to five years.
Figure 4 shows the changes in June 30 asset allocation over the past 10 years. During that period the College has decreased its bond allocation while adding substantially to the diversification of the equity allocation through a reduction in the allocation to domestic equity and increases in the allocations to international equity, hedge funds, real estate, and hard assets.
At June 30, 2009, the portfolio contained commitments to 152 different investment vehicles, representing 89 investment products and 69 investment managers. These numbers have decreased from June 30, 2008, as a result of partnership sales and the overall manager review. Over the next few years the number of investment relationships is expected to contract further as a number of the older partnership relationships come to the end of their contractual lives.
PerformanceThe endowment underperformed its composite benchmark for fiscal 2009 by 5.88 percent (-21.79 percent vs. -15.91 percent). While domestic and international equity indexes lost more than the Colby portfolio (the Russell 3000 Index lost 26.57 percent and the MSCI All-Country World ex U.S. Index lost 30.54 percent), this is still a very disappointing result. The underperformance occurred in the hedge fund and nonmarketable equity components of the portfolio, with approximately 2 percent of underperformance related to the asset sales in venture, buyout, and hard assets.
SpendingThe goal of a spending formula is to produce a stable flow of revenue for operations while maintaining, at a minimum, the purchasing power of the principal of endowment. Colby’s spending formula defines spending as a percentage of a five-year moving average of June 30 market values with adjustment for additions received in subsequent years. The use of a five-year moving average in the formula has produced a stable flow of revenue for operations with nominal dollar increases in each of the past 10 years, despite two bear markets in that time span. The smallest year-over-year percentage increase in spending during the past decade was 3.2 percent, and the 10-year compound average rate of increase is 10.9 percent.
Figure 6 shows the comparative 10-year compound average annual growth rates of endowment market value, endowment spending, student charges, and budgeted total operating revenue. The endowment spending has grown at a compound annual rate of 10.9 percent for the past 10 years. This is considerably higher than the rates for student charges (4.8 percent) and budgeted total operating revenue (6.0 percent). In addition, the budgeted endowment income as a percentage of budgeted total operating revenue increased from 11.2 percent to 16.7 percent during the past 10 years.
The spending rate for fiscal 2009 was 4.42 percent.
Organization and ProcessThe endowment investment program is the responsibility of the Investment Committee of the Board of Trustees. The Investment Committee comprises 11 trustees plus the president and chair of the Board of Trustees on an ex officio basis. Members of the Investment Committee have deep experience in a broad array of asset classes. The portfolio is divided into five components (cash, marketable securities, private equity, real estate, and hedge funds), with a subcommittee for each component that is composed of Investment Committee members with expertise in the relevant asset classes. Working with the investment staff, these subcommittees have the authority to add and terminate managers and to rebalance investments within the asset classes under their purview.
As a matter of process, all changes to the investment portfolio are approved by either the Investment Committee or one of its five subcommittees, with subcommittee actions ratified at the next regularly scheduled Investment Committee meeting. All endowment assets are managed by outside investment managers.
The Investment Committee and its subcommittees are supported by the Investment Office, which includes three full-time positions. The non-investment-manager operating expenses assigned to the endowment (salaries, travel, office expenses, legal review of partnerships, consulting, custody, UBTI taxes on partnerships, and audit) are monitored by the College’s vice president for administration and treasurer along with all other College budgets. These expenses amounted to approximately 13.4 basis points on average market value for fiscal year 2009.
The investment staff conducts ongoing diligence on existing investment managers as well as potential new managers. Changes are recommended to the Investment Committee or one of its five subcommittees. Investment manager diligence focuses on the following key areas:
Agenda for 2009-10The actions taken during fiscal 2009 have dealt with the immediate liquidity issues and have left the endowment with a stronger and more streamlined group of investment managers. During fiscal year 2010 the Investment Committee will conduct a review of the asset allocation targets for the portfolio in light of current investment opportunities and an increased focus on liquidity. It will also decide on the appropriate level of cash reserves needed to manage the portfolio through a difficult transition period, during which the College expects to have negative cash flows for the endowment for the next two to three years as spending and net partnership draws are expected to exceed gifts and transfers into the endowment.
Douglas E. Reinhardt ’71
Douglas C. Terp ’84
"We remain powerfully and emotionally committed to the financial aid program."
William D. Adams
Letter to Faculty and Staff
Balancing the Budget, Planning Ahead
President Adams on Colby and the Economy
President Adams's Letter to Students
Advice for Seniors: Don't Panic
Colby Career Center
Colby Alumni Network
Financial Crisis: Views From the Inside
Economics Panel: What is Happening?