Goldfarb Center Lecture SeriesThe Goldfarb Center brings prominent speakers from around the world to Colby' campus. Here is what they had to say.
The Amethyst Initiative: A Cotter Debate on the Drinking Age
Posted by: Susanna Thompson <smthomps@colby.edu> on: Fri, October 30, 2009, 10:32 a.m.
Listen to this episode with QuickTime.
The Amethyst Initiative consists of chancellors and presidents of universities and colleges across the United States who allege that the problem of irresponsible drinking by young people continues despite the minimum legal drinking age of 21. Yet all major public health authorities, including the American Medical Association, Centers for Disease Control, National Highway Traffic Safety Board, and surgeon general, continue to support the higher drinking age. John McCardell and David Rosenbloom presented two opposing sides of this controversial issue. Comments
On Mon, November 16, 2009, katherine van wormer wrote:
We must change the drinking culture; the gain will be long-term, not short-term. The age should be 16 and kids should be taught to drink at home. Otherwise we are making them into law breakers and leading them into illicit drug use. Today the young learn to binge drink from their peers; this is not healthy. MADD argues that car crash rates are down since 1983; they were down in the over 21 year old group as well so there were other factors other than the drinking age involved.
co-author of Addiction Treatment: A Strengths Perspective
On Mon, November 16, 2009, Linda Barrett wrote:
The cognitive development of teenagers is extremely important. To introduce a mind altering substance at that age would impair their ability to learn problem solving and decision making skills. To consume a mind altering substance teaches a person to escape from reality for a short time instead of facing problems and making positive choices. Parents should be teaching their children life skills instead of how to properly consume mind altering substances for recreation.
Car crash rates were down for the 21 year old group because at that age they have learned to make healthy decision for their life and not just concentrate on "having fun".
On Mon, November 16, 2009, anonymous wrote:
I believe that by having the drinking age at 21 we create more alcoholism. Kids like it or not believe it or not, are drinking. We create longer drinking habits by having kids drink illegally until they are 21 and then getting free reign to go show the world what they learned in back yards, colleges, and any place they could go to get away with it. They are drinking and binging for a longer periods of time waiting to get to 21. When you tell people they can't do something they of course want it more and that's what we do with the 21 law. We have more alcoholic young adults than ever before and a large percent of this are women. I would like to see a younger drinking age I think 19 would be more appropriate.
On Mon, November 16, 2009, anonymous wrote:
we allow teens to drive motor vehicles before they reach 18. We allow 18 year olds to fight for our country...yet we have a ban on purchasing alcohol unless you're 21? I don't support lowering the age of consumption or purchasing, but I think that the age is pushing the under 21's to do it illegally. Parents need to get involved in raising their children and setting the example.
On Mon, November 16, 2009, anonymous wrote:
I live in an area close to a large, expanding campus where historic houses in the neighborhood have turned into party houses that are magnets for underage drinkers. Underage drinkers pay entrance to these illegal taverns/drug houses and engage in unmonitored immature drinking behavior that has resulted in police raids, crimes being committed, vandalism and disorderly behavior, car accidents, rape and even deaths from overdoses.
Lower the drinking age! Let them go to the bars where the bartenders know how to deal with them and social norms around drinking prevail!
On Tue, November 17, 2009, linda verst wrote:
What about changing the drinking age will bring parents to more maturity in handling alcohol and other drug information with their children?! In our jail bible study our young men and women tell us that it was at home with mom and dad that they learned to drink, or use marijuana or other drugs at a young age. To think that lowering the drinking age will bring about less alcohol related accidents and other problems is at the very least naive and misguided.
On Tue, November 17, 2009, Chuck wrote:
What appears apparent is that age and laws do not make a person drink responsibly. Responsibility lies first by example of the parent(s). Children learn through example not by punishment after the damage is done. Parents should not look for anyone to blame but themselves. No one is forcing liquior or drugs down the throats of todays youth.
Subscription Options
Subscribe/Listen Using iTunes
Subscribe to this Podcast
Add to Google Reader
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe Using NewsGator
What is RSS?
Recent Posts
Obama: Has the Color of the President Changed the Character of Media?
Conflict Resolution: George Mitchell Reflects on Personal Experiences
The Amethyst Initiative: A Cotter Debate on the Drinking Age
Covering the World with a Shrinking Newsroom
The Historical Strength of Maine's Senatorial Delegation
Categories
Alumni
Bursting the Bubble
Campus Happenings
Campus Life
Events
Goldfarb Center
Lectures
Professor Work
Professors At Work
Research
Student Work
Archive
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
April 2008
March 2008
Media Types
Formats: aac,aiff, mp3
Formats: flv, mov
|