My protocol

1. draw a square
2. draw a triangle whose base is the top of the square
3. draw a rectangle with its shorter side touching the bottom of the square
4. draw a dot half way up the rectangle on the left side

The strengths of my protocol were that the figure consisted of common shapes and that the figure was rather simple. The weaknesses were that I didn't specify what size to draw the figure. Another weakness is that I did not specify that I wanted the rectangle to be inside the square, and that I wanted the rectangle to be located in the center of the base of the square

I did not use parameters. As a result, the person did not know how big to make the shapes. The drawer could have made the figure as big as the whole page or very small

When I tried my second protocol, the result was what I wanted. On my second protocol, I changed the third commad to "draw a rectangle inside the square with its shorter side touching the bottom of the square

The first director/artist task did not result in the figure I was looking for. The second one, with the adjusted protocol, did result in te figure I was looking for. The first person that I worked with used parameteris in their protocol, hwile the second person did not use parameters.

My comands were fairly sophisticated, as they assumed that the drawer knew a rectange, square, and triange. This is something that a computer might not necessarily know.