Topic Area: Endangered Species
Geographic Area: Northern Rocky Mountains
Focal Question: Can economic incentives be altered to reduce
opposition to wolf conservation?
Sources:
(1) Defenders of Wildlife World Wide Web site:
http//www.defenders.org/pr101295.html
http//www.defenders.org/pr110895.html
http//www.defenders.org/wolfcomp.html
http//www.defenders.org/ynpfact.html
http//www.defenders.org/ynpchro.html
(2) Fischer, Hank, Editorial/Opinion; Page B7 The Arizona Republic
November 25, 1995.
(3) Gerhardt, Gary Wolf Backers To Pay for Calf Rocky Mountain News;
February 1, 1995; Ed. F; Page 8A.
(4) Miniclier, Kit Wild Things The Denver Post; January 14, 1996, EMP
Page 14.
(5) US Newswire, Missoula, MT, Defenders of Wildlife Will Compensate
for First Yellowstone Wolf Kill January 18, 1996.
(6) US Newswire, Washington, Mexican Wolf Draft EIS Released:
Defenders Expands the Wolf Compensation Fund to the Southwest June
27, 1995.
Reviewer: Alex E. Roth, Colby College '96
Review:
Historically, large predators in the United States were seen as
threats to game and livestock, and were trapped, poisoned, and shot.
The Federal government launched an aggressive program to eliminate
predators early in this century, which targeted even those animals in
National Parks. In 1926 Yellowstone's last wolf was killed, and by
that time wolves were seriously endangered throughout the Western
United States.
Since then, wolves have migrated from Canada into northwestern
Montana, in the area of Glacier National Park. Conservationists have
been advocating wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone and elsewhere
since well before passage of the Endangered Species Act in 1973. But
that law actually required the US Fish and Wildlife Service to create
a recovery plan for the Gray Wolf, which was officially listed as
endangered in 1973. The ensuing controversies were so acrimonious
that years passed before any final decisions were made.
Public opinion in most of the United States seems to be strongly in
favor of wolf reintroduction, while many local ranchers have remained
vehemently opposed. Ranchers have expressed concern over the
possibility of livestock loss on land adjacent to wolf habitat.
It wasn't until November of 1994 that the Interior Department finally
approved plans to bring wolves back. The Wyoming Farm Bureau
Federation immediately challenged the decision in court. In spite of
ongoing anti-wolf efforts, federal workers went ahead with plans to
import the wild predators from Canada. In January of 1995, 15 wolves
were released in Idaho's Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness,
and 14 more were moved to temporary holding pens in Yellowstone,
where they acclimated to their new surroundings. They were released
into the park on March 21.
Defenders of Wildlife, a private non-profit organization, reasoned
that it could reduce tensions between stockmen and conservationists
by compensating ranchers for losses they suffered as a result of
encounters with wolves. In 1987, Defenders raised $100,000 from
private donations for this purpose. In the nine years since the fund
was created, they have paid nearly $19,000 to 23 ranchers for 40
cattle and 10 sheep. In cases where wolves could not be confirmed as
the culprits in the death or disappearance of livestock, owners have
been partially compensated by the fund. On several occasions,
Defenders has also financed precautionary measures to reduce the
likelihood of wolf-cattle interactions. For example, in 1990 they
paid for an electric fence which a landowner used to protect his
animals from night attacks. And two years later, they bought several
tons of hay which a Montana rancher used to keep his animals away
from a wolf den.
Encouraged by their success, Defenders created the Wolf Reward
Program in 1992. With this new fund, landowners are entitled to
$5,000 whenever a pair of wolves successfully breeds on their
property. Since the program's inception, two such awards have been
made. Defenders has also helped to apprehend wolf poachers by
offering $5,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction
of the illegal hunters.
Through these cash payments, Defenders of Wildlife has shifted the
financial burden associated with wildlife conservation.
Environmentalists, who benefit from wolves, now also pay for the
damages that the animals impose on local residents. As expected,
landowners are now more willing to live with predators. This progress
has been achieved with a surprisingly small amount of money,
especially considering the comparatively large sums spent on wolf
research and transportation.
Projects are currently underway to bring more Canadian wolves to
Idaho and Wyoming and also to restore the Mexican Wolf to part of its
historic range in the Southwest. The Wolf Compensation Fund will be
expanded to these southern areas when the Mexican Wolves arrive. The
Fund is credited with making these ambitious proposals politically
feasible.
However, wolves have always been villains in mythology, and many
people have a visceral hostility to predators which is not easily
overcome. It would be unrealistic to expect pecuniary incentives to
completely alter ingrained cultural values in such a short time. As a
result, this highly emotional issue is still controversial and is
likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.