Topic Area: Fertility Control
Geographic Area: Bangladesh
Focal Question: Is Bangladesh's Method of Fertility Control
Adequate for Sustainability?
Sources:
(1) J. Chowdhury, Ruhul Amin, and A.U. Amhed, "Poor Women's
Participation in Income Generating Projects and their Fertility
Regulation in Rural Bangladesh: Evidence From a Recent Survey",
World Development, April 1994, p 555-564.
Reviewer: Caitlin P. Lane, Colby College '96
Review:
The 1974 World Population Conference in Bucharest ,the 1984
International Conference on Population in Mexico, and the 1994
International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo have
stressed the integration of population policies with development
policy. Population control as a means of sustainable development in
Bangladesh has become a major issue. This particular study concludes
that "the participation in income-generating projects by poor rural
women has led to an increased level of contraceptive use as well as a
decreased level of desire for additional children". In Bangladesh, an
ever-growing number of both governmental and nongovernmental
organizations (the Grameen Bank, the Bangladesh Rural Advancement
Committee and the Bangladesh Rural Development Board) have begun
programs in the quest towards sustainable fertility rates.
This study identifies three main justifications for these projects
(helping to decrease fertility) in developing countries. The program
can relieve the women of a condition of extreme social and
psychological dependence. Physical and social isolation is common due
to the system of female seclusion in rural Bangladesh. Second, it
could enable the women to gain social support and acceptance of any
decision to have fewer children. This behavior is commonly dissuaded
by the hostile environment within and beyond her household. Finally,
a combination of peer group support and cohesion is created through
group formation and interaction. This works to alter women's
knowledge and attitude, as well as to support their decision making
concerning reproduction.
All income-generating projects by these three agencies have a
population education component designed to encourage lower fertility
rates. Programs to assist the poor through the use of collateral-free
loans have become quite popular in Bangladesh since the late 1980's.
Relying on peer pressure to encourage repayment, such programs have
been successful, as loan recovery rates range between 96% and 100%.
Results show that credit provision has been associated with
productive self-employment, increase in income, accumulation of
capital, and meeting basic needs of the poor loanees. A variety of
income-generating activities are undertaken by participating women in
order to pay back the loans. Such activities include: paddy husking,
poultry raising, weaving, goat-raising and horticulture. In addition,
other complementary government financed social development activities
such as sanitation, health care, nutrition, functional education, and
population education are emphasized by all three programs.
Family planning is actively and routinely promoted in group meetings,
loan workshops, and training sessions which are financed by the
agencies. A group of women constituting a loan group are neighbors
from the same village, and are likely to be aware of each other's
fertility and fertility decisions. There is great pressure from
within the group to have a high loan recovery rate, to avoid the
penalty of disqualification from loan entitlement or expulsion from
the group in the event of noncompliance with group objectives. The
programs also encourage groups to set aside funds which may be used
by individual members in times of crisis. The most important
influences on women's fertility attitudes and behaviors are the group
meetings, and training sessions, in which both loan recipients and
program staff openly exchange ideas. Women are likely to break their
cultural resistance to change through this exposure to new ideas,
role models, and lifestyles.
This case study is based on a 1992 household sample survey of 2,285
female recipients (as well as 1,168 counterpart nonbeneficiaries) of
collateral-free loans from three relatively large rural development
agencies in Bangladesh. The comparison group of nonbeneficiaries came
from neighboring geographic areas with similar communication
facilities and socioeconomic characteristics such as literacy rate,
topography, access to electric power, and presence of other
developmental programs. Only married women within the reproductive
age group of 14 and 49 were selected. Following a random selection
process, 3,453 total women were selected and interviewed. The survey,
funded by US agency for International Development (USAID), collected
detailed information on the women's socioeconomic backgrounds, their
income generating activities, and their knowledge, attitudes, and
practices of family planning.
The dependent variable was contraceptive (temporary, permanent, male,
female) use, using a code of one if a couple is currently using a
contraceptive and zero if they are not. The study controlled for
various socioeconomic and demographic background variables that may
affect the results. These independent variables were: the number of
living children, years of schooling, age, ownership of assets, and
husband's occupation. The study used "a logistic regression applied
in multivariate analyses".
Results show that knowledge of contraceptive methods (through the
population education component and group meetings with staff members)
and the desire for no more children were higher among the
beneficiaries of income-generating projects compared to
nonbeneficiaries. About 60% of the beneficiaries were current users
of contraceptives, compared to about 38% use by nonbeneficiaries.
Also, about 80% of the beneficiaries desired no more children, while
only 63% of nonbeneficiaries shared the same desire. The income
generating projects led to an increase in contraceptive use
regardless of their population education components. Over 50% who did
not participate in their population education components were current
users of contraceptives, compared to 38.4% of the nonbeneficiaries.
This suggests that the income-generating projects have an independent
effect on the demand for fertility regulation and contraceptive. This
effect is stronger than the results from population education
activities. The positive effects of income generating projects and
their education component dealing with contraceptive use is more
significant than the effect of other socioeconomic variables such as
the women's education, husband's education, or possession of modern
consumer items.
Establishing a way to draw poor women out of their traditional female
confinement within the households and providing opportunities for
female income-generating activities, has lead to increased
contraceptive use and desire for decreased family size. These effects
were much higher than have been achieved by the existing national
family planning program of Bangladesh (Amin et al., 1993). The
women's low socioeconomic position has been more than compensated by
the opportunities received from the projects. Many reasons have been
offered for this. Population education components of the projects
through small group meetings helped the women by providing face to
face information about fertility regulation. Also, people trusted the
projects as they realized they had taken care of the basic economic
survival needs of the poor women. Many view the staffs of the income
generating projects as being more credible than the usual health or
family planning groups. Third, the requirement of group formation,
led to pressure for members to comply to the group's norms of smaller
family size. The possibility that additional children by a member
will reduce a members ability to repay loans, for which the group is
jointly liable, may reinforce the group influence on fertility
regulation. Finally, education or skill training may inadvertently
influence fertility regulation by changing their clients' ideas and
perspectives.
The income generating projects have achieved remarkable success among
a population that has been ignored by conventional development
programs. This success has been achieved by a self-sustaining
approach of repayable loan programs. This approach of joint rural
development and population control would also raise the standard of
living of the large populations which are close to or below the
subsistence level. Bangladesh appears to be on its way towards
achieving an economically, as well as socially, sustainable fertility
rate.