Aug. 15, 2003
The New, Very Real Peril of Sharing Music or Movie Files by Computer
Dear Mom and Dad,
The semester started really well! I have a nice roommate, my classes are
great and the food in the dining halls is wonderful.
Oh, just one little problem Ive been sued by the Recording
Industry Association of America. I only had 200 songs on my computer that
I downloaded with Kazaa but they sued me for $150,000 each. I heard they
might settle for a lot less than $30 million, though. That is such a relief!
Can you get ready to send your life savings to them? Sorry I messed you
guys up and destroyed my sisters plans. Everyone is doing it and
I never thought they would pick on me but they did
There are many misperceptions about copyright law, fair use, music and
movie file sharing, and the implications of infringing copyright. One
thing is certain: The situation has changed a great deal since last spring.
Anyone who is using peer-to-peer (P2P) software like Kazaa, eDonkey, Gnutella,
Limewire, etc. to download music and/or video files in violation of copyright
restrictions now faces potentially enormous financial costs. College students
are being sued for copyright infringement involving P2P applications;
and their families are having to pay settlement amounts of well over $15,000
just to avoid the even larger cost of going to court, even if the suit
is successfully defended much, less the implications of losing in court.
For several years the Colby administration has provided warnings to students
about the legal issues associated with music and video copyright and the
criminal and civil penalties that might result from the use of computers
to infringe copyright limitations on the distribution and possession of
copies of the digital content. It is now absolutely imperative to understand
the risks associated with sharing music and movies with others using the
network, not only for your well being but also for the financial well
being of your family who will probably bear the brunt of the effects of
your being sued.
What is Copyright?
The US Constitution authorizes Congress to establish laws respecting copyright:
The Congress shall have Power To promote the Progress of Science
and useful Arts, by securing for limited Tymes to Authors and Inventors
the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8
Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United
States (title 17, U.S. Code) to the authors of original works of
authorship, including literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and
certain other intellectual works Section 106 of the 1976 Copyright
Act generally gives the owner of copyright the exclusive right to do and
to authorize others to do the following:
To reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords;
To prepare derivative works based upon the work;
To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public
by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;
Reduced to its basic element, copyright means you are prohibited from
making a copy of a work (text, image, recording, musical score, movie,
etc.) without permission of the owner, especially if you sell or give
away the copy.The details of copyright law are complex and interpretation
is sometimes controversial, especially what constitutes fair use
in an academic setting for research and class use or for personal use.
For commercial products such as music CDs and movie DVDs, the law prohibits
copying unless the owner of the copyright has specifically given permission.
For example, I purchased a Sony Music CD that has the following notice:
Warning: All rights reserved, including all rights of the producer
and of the owner of the recorded work. Unauthorized copying, public performance,
broadcasting, hiring or rental of this recording prohibited, as provided
by applicable law.
FAQS
Am I permitted to use my computer to burn a copy of this CD to
give to someone else? No.
Am I permitted to use my computer to burn a copy of this CD for
my own use so I can keep the original CD in a safe place? Yes, this is
generally interpreted to be permitted under Fair Use.
Am I permitted to convert the tracks of this CD to MP3 files and
send them by email to my friends? No.
Is my friend permitted to distribute copies of the MP3 files because
there is no displayed copyright notice or prohibition on copying? No.
Am I permitted to convert the tracks of this CD to MP3 files so
I can play them on my MP3 player instead of playing the original CD? Yes,
this is generally interpreted to be permitted under Fair Use.
Am I permitted to loan this CD to my friends for a fee (i.e., rental)?
No.
Am I permitted to sell this CD to my friend? Yes, but I may not
keep a copy.
When you buy a book, CD, DVD or other medium, you do not own the content.
You own the right to access the content yourself but not to copy it for
others to use as well. The right to copy and distribute the content is
usually explicitly retained by the owner of the copyright, usually the
author/composer/performer or their agent or distributor. Not all copyrighted
content has a prohibition on copying. The owner of the copyright may explicitly
give permission for individuals to copy and distribute the content. This
is common for promotional items and for demonstration versions.However,
commercial products rarely provide this authorization. An unlabeled copy
of content, such as an MP3 file, that you should reasonably know is derived
from a commercial product must not be received (downloaded) or copied.
Colbys Policies on Copyright
Members of the Colby community are expected to obey the law. Because of
the power of information technology to quickly and massively infringe
copyright, the Code of Ethics for Information Technology at Colby College
explicitly prohibits theft, including the illegal duplication of
copyrighted material, or the propagation, use, or possession of illegally
copied software or data. [www.colby.edu/info.tech/policies]
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Applications
The communication capability provided by the Internet enables any computer
to share information directly with any other computer anywhere in the
world on the network. These are peer computers that are communicating,
rather than servers being accessed by individual client computers as in
systems like the web and email. Applications like Kazaa, Gnutella, Limewire,
Morpheous, eDonkey and many others have become popular because they can
be used to find and access files created from commercial products like
CDs. MP3 audio track files and MPG and AVI video files are commonly made
available through these applications. These files are created by making
digital copies of the original content and then made available for access
through the P2P application. Those who create the original copies and
make them available for access by others have violated copyright law (infringed
the rights of the copyright owner). Those who access and make their
own copies of those files have violated copyright law. Those who, in turn,
make their illegal copies available for others to copy using the P2P applications
are violating copyright law.
The computer technology available for making digital copies of CDs, DVDs
and other products, as well as the communication infrastructure of the
Internet and P2P applications have created a vast resource for illegally
sharing copyrighted content. The only barrier to using this resource is
the recognition that it is illegal to use the P2P capability to make copies
of the content in the files. Educational efforts by representatives of
the copyright owners and by Internet Service Providers such as colleges
like Colby have been unsuccessful in reducing the use of P2P applications
to steal content by violating copyright law.
An important aspect of the P2P application environment is that anyone
might use it and anyones network address can be determined. Consequently,
the copyright owners themselves or law enforcement officers may use the
applications and other tools to determine who is distributing files that
infringe copyright or violate other laws. There is no anonymity on the
Internet. Although College policy prohibits monitoring individual computer
use for content, it should be assumed that communication on the Internet
is being monitored by someone outside the College.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
The DMCA refines copyright law in light of the new capabilities of digital
computers and networks and provides a mechanism for protecting companies
from legal consequences of the illegal activities of their clients/customers.
Colby is a network provider and the individual students, faculty, and
staff are the clients/customers.
A copyright owner may submit a complaint to the network provider in which
a specific network address is determined to be providing content in violation
of their copyright. The network provider must do what is necessary to
have the content removed and, if there is a repetition of the violation,
the responsible individuals access to the network must be terminated.
In the past 18 months, Colby has received about 45 complaints under the
DMCA. Many students in our community have experienced the unpleasant process
that takes place when a complaint about their computer occurs. Fortunately,
this is almost always the end of the process and the students name
has never been divulged to the copyright owner as a result of the complaints
Colby has received.
DMCA procedures at Colby are found here: www.colby.edu/info.tech/policies/html/dmca.html
Recent Legal Action
Having been unsuccessful in stemming the flood of copyright violation
occurring with P2P applications using education and the basic mechanism
of the DMCA, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) began
taking direct legal action against individuals last spring by using subpoenas
to obtain the names of people who are responsible for the computers sharing
large numbers of music files. Four students at three academic institutions
were named in lawsuits filed last spring. Although sued for millions of
dollars, the students and their families settled out of court for over
$15,000 each. One reason they settled may have been that the cost of defending
oneself in court in such cases is enormous. These settlements, while far
less than the original amount sought in the suit, drained the families
savings accounts and perhaps meant second mortgages on the homes of the
students parents. The RIAA has been processing hundreds of new subpoenas
over the past few weeks and, with the opening of the school year, we can
expect many to be sent to colleges and universities demanding the names
of individuals doing the file sharing.
It should be obvious to everyone that the hypothetical peril of sharing
copyrighted material through P2P applications over the Internet or even
just within the institution is now a very real peril. It should also be
obvious that the consequences can have catastrophic effects on the family
of the individual who is accused of committing the crime.
What Should You Do To Protect Yourself?
Each person is responsible for what is done with the computer under their
control. You should remove any P2P application and dont let anyone
install software on your computer. Even if you are only downloading
files, you are still violating the law.
There are no excuses for trafficking in stolen property (file sharing
of copyrighted content). Complaints about the cost of CDs and slowness
of the industry to adapt to technology just dont cut it. If you
think a good defense will be that everyone is doing it, you
should start thinking about what an example you will make when you are
sued and everyone else just experiences the fear that it might happen
to them too.
Questions?
I cannot provide legal advice but I can help with general questions about
copyright law and how it needs to be considered in P2P and other information
technology situations. Feel free to send me email at rbphilli@colby.edu.
Raymond B. Phillips
Director of Information Technology Services, Colby College