The Proposals stated:
The white/black racial imbalance on this campus is racist as well as discriminatory against the twelve Afro-Americans now in residence. In order to rectify this situation the following measures should be enacted:
- The recruitment of black students who would probably require some type of remedial assistance. Such assistance could be given in a variety of ways.
- Colby could establish a summer preparatory program such as those now in existence at Bowdoin and the University of Maine (Upward Bound).
- Colby could endeavor to send as many incoming black students as possible to existing Upward Bound programs.
- Colby could establish a transitional year or similar program to cope with the needs of these students while they are here.
- The hiring of as many as possible Black professors.
- The establishment, on a permanent basis, of basic courses such as the Negro History course being taught by Professor Foner this semester.
- The incorporation of various aspects of black culture and black concerns into certain existing courses now offered in various departments at Colby.
- The admission of a freshman class which will be at least 10% black.
 | Charlie Terrell |
Yet as the spring progressed, there was little evidence of genuine interest in the proposals from the administration. That Spring, Charles Terrell, a black junior, ran for president of the Student Government with the party name of Uhuru Nakawi (Freedom Now) along with several other black students, placing the racial problem as the focus of their campaign. They lost the election, and over the course of the 1969-1970 year, progress was scarce. Ultimately direct action was taken.
At 8:30 p.m. on Monday, March 2, 1970, 17 members of SOBU began an occupation of Lorimer Chapel with a list of five non-negotiable demands presented to President Strider, the college administration, the faculty, and the student body. They had selected the chapel because they felt it was the one building on campus whose elimination from daily life would least hamper the ability of the school to function normally. While most of the student body was unaware this action was to be taken, by Monday morning the administration was informed, and Deans Jonas Rosenthal and E. Parker Johnson were on hand at the chapel that night. For the next eight days, the black students held strong on their demands, refusing to be pulled back into the administrative quagmire. Meanwhile, outside the chapel, student support swelled as whites, sympathetic to the concerns of the black students, organized their own protests.
Charles Terrell, then president of SOBU, helped lead the chapel takeover. The students in the chapel issued their initial statement as they entered the chapel, including their demands which were heavily based on the "Proposals for a New Colby" (full text of letter listing demands).
President Strider responded in writing on Tuesday, March 2, sternly refusing to cooperate. He wrote:
" ...the college cannot engage in the most useful kinds of discussion under the present circumstances. The occupation of a building occasions the disruption of normal college activities, and, as long as you are obstructing the normal use of Lorimer Chapel, you are engaged in illegal trespass.
If it is approach to your stated goals that concerns you most, you can signal this by leaving the chapel and talking with some of us about real approaches to these goals.
If you remain in the chapel, it will appear that your concerns are more with the notoriety of your action and with the atmosphere which could easily be established through continued occupation." (full text of letter)
The black students held firm, though, responding the same day in a letter that further explained how they felt justified in continuing their occupation:
"If you are unable to engage in 'the most useful kinds of discussion under the present circumstances' then it appears that we are not going to be able to discuss this matter. The perpetration of racism 'occasions disruption' of normal human development. Therefore, we feel justified in obstructing the normal use of Lorimer Chapel. Hence, the matter of illegal trespass in the Chapel is pitifully irrelevant when compared to the matter of man's illegal trespass against human dignity." (full text of letter)
Over the next several days, despite the administration conceding to meet in the chapel, little progress was made. Rumors circulated that the administration was attempting to spark a riot in the chapel, thereby justifying police intervention. But the students held strong. |