What Will Happen?
What will happen when I report Academic Negligence?
Upon determining that a student has committed academic negligence, faculty are required to submit a report to the Academic Integrity Coordinator (AIC) and select the appropriate sanction(s). Students are notified by the AIC of reports of academic negligence. The student’s Class Dean and academic advisor(s) are also typically notified.
Students who commit academic negligence are required to have an educational conversation with the instructor about the transgression and may be required to successfully complete an instructive module on plagiarism or other educational sanctions deemed appropriate by the instructor. Proof of the completion of sanctions must be provided to the instructor and AIC. Students are required to complete the sanctions before the deadline for grade submission or they will receive an administrative incomplete in the course.
What will happen when I report Academic Dishonesty?
Here are flowcharts of the process for faculty (FacultyFlowChart) and students (StudentFlowChart).
Academic Dishonesty Process
-
- The Academic Integrity Coordinator (AIC) (who is a member of staff in the Office of Community Values) will be notified of an alleged violation via a report by the instructor. The AIC will notify the Dean of Studies Office.
- The AIC will engage with the reporting instructor to ensure all the appropriate materials are submitted.
- The AIC will meet with the student to explain the Academic Review Board Process.
- The student may submit a written response to the alleged violation and a mitigating circumstances letter.
- An Academic Review Board will be formed to handle the case. An Academic Review Board consists of:
- The Academic Integrity Coordinator, who chairs the Board as a non-voting member.
- Two faculty members, selected by the AIC from the membership of the Academic Honesty Committee. The Academic Honesty Committee is appointed by the Provost.
- Two students, from a pool of students appointed by the Dean of the College.
The identities of those serving on the Board shall be provided to the reporting instructor and the student (Respondent), and both will be provided with an opportunity to notify the AIC of any conflicts of interest or bias concerns. The AIC shall resolve any claims of conflicts or bias.
A member of the Office of the General Counsel may attend any hearings and assist the Coordinator or Board in the administration of the hearing process.
If a case requires adjudication in the period between the end of the spring semester examinations and the start of the subsequent fall semester, the student members of the board may be appointed by the AIC from among students living on campus for the summer. If the case cannot be heard, it will be postponed until the following semester.
- The Academic Review Board does not hold live hearings; reporting instructors and students must submit written reports and responses, and all supporting materials and evidence must be submitted electronically to the AIC. All submitted evidence and materials will be shared with the student before the board meets to consider the matter. A reasonable opportunity will be provided to the reporting instructor and students to respond to submitted materials.
- The AIC and Director (or their designees) may seek clarifications from the instructor, student or relevant witnesses, make inquiries to other College departments or offices for information or evidence, and take other steps deemed appropriate to ensure the Board has the information necessary to make fully informed decisions.
- If the student accepts responsibility for the violation, the Academic Review Board will assign a sanction in keeping with established norms for similar cases.
- If the student does not accept responsibility for the alleged violation, members of the Academic Review Board will review and discuss all the relevant materials and reach a decision on responsibility and, if applicable, sanctions. The standard of proof for determining whether a violation has occurred is a “preponderance of the evidence”; that is, was it more likely than not that the violation occurred?
- Because of the complexity of some matters, there are no fixed timeframes or deadlines. However, the AIC and Board will work deliberately and carefully, but as efficiently as possible, since it is in everyone’s interests for cases to be wrapped up in a timely manner.